Review



monoclonal mouse anti cd105 primary antibody  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 92

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems monoclonal mouse anti cd105 primary antibody
    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Monoclonal Mouse Anti Cd105 Primary Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody/pmc11885616-76-19-24
    Average 92 stars, based on 3 article reviews
    monoclonal mouse anti cd105 primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    92/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Inhibition of TGF-β signaling enhances osteogenic potential of iPSC-derived MSCs"

    Article Title: Inhibition of TGF-β signaling enhances osteogenic potential of iPSC-derived MSCs

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89370-w

    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Figure Legend Snippet: List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.

    Techniques Used: Cytometry, Recombinant

    ( A ) Cell morphology during differentiation of iPSCs to iMSCs with SB431542 (+ SB). Representative fluorescence images (10x magnification, scale bar = 100 μm) of undifferentiated iPSCs at day d0 and differentiating cells at different days (d2, d5, d7, and d10) of mesenchymal differentiation (P0). To visualize differentiation, cells were stained for CD105 (green) using a primary mouse anti-CD105 antibody and an AlexaFluor488 labeled secondary goat anti-mouse IgG antibody. The control sample was stained with secondary antibody only. Samples were counterstained with phalloidin-Atto550 (red) and DAPI (blue) to visualize F-actin and nuclei. ( B ) Percentage of CD105 + cells at P0 of iMSC differentiation with (+ SB) and without SB431542 (-SB). To determine the percentage of differentiated cells and the resulting cell density after passaging to P1, CD105 expression in iMSCs of passage 0 was determined by flow cytometry. The two groups were compared using a paired Student’s t-test ( n = 10). ( C ) Representative histogram of CD105 expression in iMSCs + SB (blue), -SB (red) and unstained control (green).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Cell morphology during differentiation of iPSCs to iMSCs with SB431542 (+ SB). Representative fluorescence images (10x magnification, scale bar = 100 μm) of undifferentiated iPSCs at day d0 and differentiating cells at different days (d2, d5, d7, and d10) of mesenchymal differentiation (P0). To visualize differentiation, cells were stained for CD105 (green) using a primary mouse anti-CD105 antibody and an AlexaFluor488 labeled secondary goat anti-mouse IgG antibody. The control sample was stained with secondary antibody only. Samples were counterstained with phalloidin-Atto550 (red) and DAPI (blue) to visualize F-actin and nuclei. ( B ) Percentage of CD105 + cells at P0 of iMSC differentiation with (+ SB) and without SB431542 (-SB). To determine the percentage of differentiated cells and the resulting cell density after passaging to P1, CD105 expression in iMSCs of passage 0 was determined by flow cytometry. The two groups were compared using a paired Student’s t-test ( n = 10). ( C ) Representative histogram of CD105 expression in iMSCs + SB (blue), -SB (red) and unstained control (green).

    Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Staining, Labeling, Control, Passaging, Expressing, Flow Cytometry

    Surface marker expression during iMSC-differentiation. Expression of ( A ) iPSC-markers (CD326, SSEA-4, SSEA-4, Tra-1-60, Tra-1-81) and ( B ) of MSC-markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105) was measured by flow cytometry. Percentages of positive cells from iPSCs (red) and iMSCs differentiated with (green) and without SB (blue) at different passages of the iMSC differentiation process. Means and standard deviations are displayed and were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tuckey’s multiple comparison test ( n ≥ 7, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; # indicate significant p-values compared to iPSCs).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Surface marker expression during iMSC-differentiation. Expression of ( A ) iPSC-markers (CD326, SSEA-4, SSEA-4, Tra-1-60, Tra-1-81) and ( B ) of MSC-markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105) was measured by flow cytometry. Percentages of positive cells from iPSCs (red) and iMSCs differentiated with (green) and without SB (blue) at different passages of the iMSC differentiation process. Means and standard deviations are displayed and were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tuckey’s multiple comparison test ( n ≥ 7, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; # indicate significant p-values compared to iPSCs).

    Techniques Used: Marker, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Comparison

    Related Articles

    Labeling:

    Article Title: Preferential magnetic targeting of carbon nanotubes to cancer sites: noninvasive tracking using MRI in a murine breast cancer model.
    Article Snippet: 2015 Aim: This study evaluated the improvement in magnetic targeting of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) in a 4T1-induced breast cancer murine model and compared their enhanced delivery with active targeted SWCNTs conjugated with a specific antibody for prospective applications as drug-delivery nanocarriers.. Materials & methods: Polyvinylpyrrolidone SWCNTs, loaded with iron oxide nanoparticles to improve their magnetic resonance detection and magnet attraction using an optimized flexible magnet positioned over the tumor site were developed.. They were equally conjugated with Endoglin/CD105 antibody for SWCNTs active targeting.

    Binding Assay:

    Article Title: Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as&nbsp;efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
    Article Snippet: .. For specific active targeting to tumor sites, magnetic SWCNTs were finally conjugated with a mouse Endoglin/CD105 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) active ester method, and the binding of antibodies was monitored by recording the absorbance for proteins/antibodies at 280 nm and confirmed using in situ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay. .. To assess the efficiency of SWCNTs as drug delivery nanocarriers to tumor sites, magnetic CD105-conjugated SWCNTs were loaded with DOX antitumor drug (R&D Systems).

    Article Title: Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
    Article Snippet: .. For specific active targeting to tumor sites, magnetic SWCNTs were finally conjugated with a mouse Endoglin/CD105 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) active ester method, and the binding of antibodies was monitored by recording the absorbance for proteins/antibodies at 280 nm and confirmed using in situ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay. .. To assess the efficiency of SWCNTs as drug delivery nanocarriers to tumor sites, magnetic CD105-conjugated SWCNTs were loaded with DOX antitumor drug (R&D Systems).

    In Situ:

    Article Title: Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as&nbsp;efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
    Article Snippet: .. For specific active targeting to tumor sites, magnetic SWCNTs were finally conjugated with a mouse Endoglin/CD105 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) active ester method, and the binding of antibodies was monitored by recording the absorbance for proteins/antibodies at 280 nm and confirmed using in situ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay. .. To assess the efficiency of SWCNTs as drug delivery nanocarriers to tumor sites, magnetic CD105-conjugated SWCNTs were loaded with DOX antitumor drug (R&D Systems).

    Article Title: Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
    Article Snippet: .. For specific active targeting to tumor sites, magnetic SWCNTs were finally conjugated with a mouse Endoglin/CD105 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) active ester method, and the binding of antibodies was monitored by recording the absorbance for proteins/antibodies at 280 nm and confirmed using in situ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay. .. To assess the efficiency of SWCNTs as drug delivery nanocarriers to tumor sites, magnetic CD105-conjugated SWCNTs were loaded with DOX antitumor drug (R&D Systems).

    Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:

    Article Title: Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as&nbsp;efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
    Article Snippet: .. For specific active targeting to tumor sites, magnetic SWCNTs were finally conjugated with a mouse Endoglin/CD105 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) active ester method, and the binding of antibodies was monitored by recording the absorbance for proteins/antibodies at 280 nm and confirmed using in situ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay. .. To assess the efficiency of SWCNTs as drug delivery nanocarriers to tumor sites, magnetic CD105-conjugated SWCNTs were loaded with DOX antitumor drug (R&D Systems).

    Article Title: Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
    Article Snippet: .. For specific active targeting to tumor sites, magnetic SWCNTs were finally conjugated with a mouse Endoglin/CD105 monoclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) using 1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide (EDC)/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS) active ester method, and the binding of antibodies was monitored by recording the absorbance for proteins/antibodies at 280 nm and confirmed using in situ enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based assay. .. To assess the efficiency of SWCNTs as drug delivery nanocarriers to tumor sites, magnetic CD105-conjugated SWCNTs were loaded with DOX antitumor drug (R&D Systems).



    Similar Products

    90
    OriGene anti endoglin
    (A) , Wild-type (WT) and KI mice HTRZ for either PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were infused with vehicle (0.2% BSA in PBS) or VEGF-A (a total of 3.5μg in 100μl of vehicle) through the carotid artery for 15 days using a mini osmotic pump as in Methods. Left: Brain coronal sections (40μm thick) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies to visualize brain vessels. Enhanced visualization surfaces were generated using Imaris software from representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density in WT and PS1 FAD brains quantified using Imaris 9.9 software as in Methods. (B) , WT and HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutants M146V or I213T mice were injected through the carotid artery for 20 minutes with either vehicle or 100ng of VEGF-A in vehicle prepared as in 1A using a catheter as described in Methods. Brain microvessels (MV) were isolated as in Methods, lysed in Triton X-100 buffer, and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-VEGFR2 antibody or control IgG. Left: IPs were analyzed on Western blots (WBs) <t>using</t> <t>anti-endoglin</t> or anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (upper panel). Input samples are shown in lower panel. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graph shows quantification of endoglin co-IPed with VEGFR2, normalized to IPed VEGFR2. (C) , WT mice were infused for 15 days through the carotid artery with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1A using a mini osmotic pump (as in 1A). For RO injection, mice were treated with vehicle (2% DMSO, 30% PEG 300, 5% Tween-80 in ddH2O) or RO in vehicle (5mg/kg body weight) via five injections in tail vein one injection every three days, with first injection administered 1 hour before osmotic pump implantation. Brain coronal sections (40μm) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies as in 1A. Left: Representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres are shown prepared as in 1A. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density quantified using Imaris software as in 1A. (D) , WT adult mice were treated with either 50μl vehicle as in 1C or 1mg/kg RO in vehicle via carotid artery as in Methods. 15-16 hrs later, 50 μl vehicle prepared as in 1A or 100ng VEGF-A in vehicle was administered via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1B. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. Vinculin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (E) , WT mice and mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were treated with vehicle or VEGF-A via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1D. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (F) , WT pCECs were prepared and treated as in Methods with vehicle (DMSO) or RO (200nM in DMSO) and then stimulated with either vehicle (PBS) or VEGF-A (20ng in PBS) for 15min. Upper: Cells were co-immunostained with either anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (green) or early endosome marker Rab5 (red) and cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in Methods. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in RO-treated WT cells compared to vehicle-treated cells measured with Imaris software. (G) , pCECs from either WT or mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T), were stimulated with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1F. Upper: Cells were co-stained with anti-VEGFR2 antibodies and early endosome marker Rab5 as in 1F. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in 1F. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in PS1 FAD WT/M146V or WT/I213T HTRZ mice compared to WT measured with Imaris software. For Figs A-G, data are shown as Mean ± S.E. from at least three independent experiments or as indicated in the dot plots. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. ns = not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
    Anti Endoglin, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/CD105+(ENG)+Mouse+Monoclonal+Antibody/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__12__724648-193-22-21
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti endoglin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology resource source identifier antibodies mouse anti cd105 monoclonal antibody santa cruz biotechnology
    (A) , Wild-type (WT) and KI mice HTRZ for either PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were infused with vehicle (0.2% BSA in PBS) or VEGF-A (a total of 3.5μg in 100μl of vehicle) through the carotid artery for 15 days using a mini osmotic pump as in Methods. Left: Brain coronal sections (40μm thick) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies to visualize brain vessels. Enhanced visualization surfaces were generated using Imaris software from representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density in WT and PS1 FAD brains quantified using Imaris 9.9 software as in Methods. (B) , WT and HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutants M146V or I213T mice were injected through the carotid artery for 20 minutes with either vehicle or 100ng of VEGF-A in vehicle prepared as in 1A using a catheter as described in Methods. Brain microvessels (MV) were isolated as in Methods, lysed in Triton X-100 buffer, and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-VEGFR2 antibody or control IgG. Left: IPs were analyzed on Western blots (WBs) <t>using</t> <t>anti-endoglin</t> or anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (upper panel). Input samples are shown in lower panel. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graph shows quantification of endoglin co-IPed with VEGFR2, normalized to IPed VEGFR2. (C) , WT mice were infused for 15 days through the carotid artery with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1A using a mini osmotic pump (as in 1A). For RO injection, mice were treated with vehicle (2% DMSO, 30% PEG 300, 5% Tween-80 in ddH2O) or RO in vehicle (5mg/kg body weight) via five injections in tail vein one injection every three days, with first injection administered 1 hour before osmotic pump implantation. Brain coronal sections (40μm) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies as in 1A. Left: Representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres are shown prepared as in 1A. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density quantified using Imaris software as in 1A. (D) , WT adult mice were treated with either 50μl vehicle as in 1C or 1mg/kg RO in vehicle via carotid artery as in Methods. 15-16 hrs later, 50 μl vehicle prepared as in 1A or 100ng VEGF-A in vehicle was administered via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1B. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. Vinculin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (E) , WT mice and mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were treated with vehicle or VEGF-A via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1D. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (F) , WT pCECs were prepared and treated as in Methods with vehicle (DMSO) or RO (200nM in DMSO) and then stimulated with either vehicle (PBS) or VEGF-A (20ng in PBS) for 15min. Upper: Cells were co-immunostained with either anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (green) or early endosome marker Rab5 (red) and cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in Methods. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in RO-treated WT cells compared to vehicle-treated cells measured with Imaris software. (G) , pCECs from either WT or mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T), were stimulated with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1F. Upper: Cells were co-stained with anti-VEGFR2 antibodies and early endosome marker Rab5 as in 1F. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in 1F. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in PS1 FAD WT/M146V or WT/I213T HTRZ mice compared to WT measured with Imaris software. For Figs A-G, data are shown as Mean ± S.E. from at least three independent experiments or as indicated in the dot plots. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. ns = not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
    Resource Source Identifier Antibodies Mouse Anti Cd105 Monoclonal Antibody Santa Cruz Biotechnology, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Endoglin+Antibody/pm40782801-248-2-10
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    resource source identifier antibodies mouse anti cd105 monoclonal antibody santa cruz biotechnology - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    R&D Systems monoclonal mouse anti cd105 primary antibody
    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Monoclonal Mouse Anti Cd105 Primary Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody/pmc11885616-76-19-24
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monoclonal mouse anti cd105 primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank endoglin cd105 monoclonal mouse antibody
    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Endoglin Cd105 Monoclonal Mouse Antibody, supplied by Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/anti-Endoglin%2FCD105%2FTGF-receptor+III+complex/pmc11865430__42003_2025_7751_MOESM1_ESM-3-80-91
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    endoglin cd105 monoclonal mouse antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems endoglin cd105 monoclonal mouse antibody
    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Endoglin Cd105 Monoclonal Mouse Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Human+Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody/pmc11865430__42003_2025_7751_MOESM1_ESM-25-16-20
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    endoglin cd105 monoclonal mouse antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Novus Biologicals mouse monoclonal endoglin cd105
    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Mouse Monoclonal Endoglin Cd105, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody+(3A9)+-+BSA+Free/pm38850807-90-68-77
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal endoglin cd105 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems rat monoclonal anti cd105
    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.
    Rat Monoclonal Anti Cd105, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody/pm38653242-326-22-27
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat monoclonal anti cd105 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems rat anti cd105 monoclonal
    EXO KV11 suppresses VEGF-induced vascular leakage in vivo . (A) Schematic depiction of the pre-treatment procedure in a VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. After 24 h, 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 24 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested at the endpoint. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and <t>CD105</t> + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 7 - 10 mice per condition). (D) Representative confocal images of anti-CD105, anti-Claudin-5-stained retinal vessels in mice treated as in (A). (E) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (F) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (E) (n = 4 - 9 mice per condition). (G) Representative photographs of Evans blue leakage in SD rats ears in an auricular Miles assay with intradermal injection with VEGF, VEGF+KV11 mixture, or VEGF+EXO KV11 mixture. The data represent as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (F). Scale bars, 50 µm.
    Rat Anti Cd105 Monoclonal, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody/pmc08039955-256-34-39
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat anti cd105 monoclonal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems antibody rat anti cd105 monoclonal
    EXO KV11 suppresses VEGF-induced vascular leakage in vivo . (A) Schematic depiction of the pre-treatment procedure in a VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. After 24 h, 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 24 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested at the endpoint. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and <t>CD105</t> + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 7 - 10 mice per condition). (D) Representative confocal images of anti-CD105, anti-Claudin-5-stained retinal vessels in mice treated as in (A). (E) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (F) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (E) (n = 4 - 9 mice per condition). (G) Representative photographs of Evans blue leakage in SD rats ears in an auricular Miles assay with intradermal injection with VEGF, VEGF+KV11 mixture, or VEGF+EXO KV11 mixture. The data represent as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (F). Scale bars, 50 µm.
    Antibody Rat Anti Cd105 Monoclonal, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+endoglin+cd105+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+Endoglin%2FCD105+Antibody/pmc08039955-263-16-22
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody rat anti cd105 monoclonal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) , Wild-type (WT) and KI mice HTRZ for either PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were infused with vehicle (0.2% BSA in PBS) or VEGF-A (a total of 3.5μg in 100μl of vehicle) through the carotid artery for 15 days using a mini osmotic pump as in Methods. Left: Brain coronal sections (40μm thick) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies to visualize brain vessels. Enhanced visualization surfaces were generated using Imaris software from representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density in WT and PS1 FAD brains quantified using Imaris 9.9 software as in Methods. (B) , WT and HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutants M146V or I213T mice were injected through the carotid artery for 20 minutes with either vehicle or 100ng of VEGF-A in vehicle prepared as in 1A using a catheter as described in Methods. Brain microvessels (MV) were isolated as in Methods, lysed in Triton X-100 buffer, and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-VEGFR2 antibody or control IgG. Left: IPs were analyzed on Western blots (WBs) using anti-endoglin or anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (upper panel). Input samples are shown in lower panel. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graph shows quantification of endoglin co-IPed with VEGFR2, normalized to IPed VEGFR2. (C) , WT mice were infused for 15 days through the carotid artery with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1A using a mini osmotic pump (as in 1A). For RO injection, mice were treated with vehicle (2% DMSO, 30% PEG 300, 5% Tween-80 in ddH2O) or RO in vehicle (5mg/kg body weight) via five injections in tail vein one injection every three days, with first injection administered 1 hour before osmotic pump implantation. Brain coronal sections (40μm) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies as in 1A. Left: Representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres are shown prepared as in 1A. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density quantified using Imaris software as in 1A. (D) , WT adult mice were treated with either 50μl vehicle as in 1C or 1mg/kg RO in vehicle via carotid artery as in Methods. 15-16 hrs later, 50 μl vehicle prepared as in 1A or 100ng VEGF-A in vehicle was administered via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1B. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. Vinculin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (E) , WT mice and mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were treated with vehicle or VEGF-A via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1D. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (F) , WT pCECs were prepared and treated as in Methods with vehicle (DMSO) or RO (200nM in DMSO) and then stimulated with either vehicle (PBS) or VEGF-A (20ng in PBS) for 15min. Upper: Cells were co-immunostained with either anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (green) or early endosome marker Rab5 (red) and cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in Methods. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in RO-treated WT cells compared to vehicle-treated cells measured with Imaris software. (G) , pCECs from either WT or mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T), were stimulated with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1F. Upper: Cells were co-stained with anti-VEGFR2 antibodies and early endosome marker Rab5 as in 1F. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in 1F. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in PS1 FAD WT/M146V or WT/I213T HTRZ mice compared to WT measured with Imaris software. For Figs A-G, data are shown as Mean ± S.E. from at least three independent experiments or as indicated in the dot plots. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. ns = not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PS FAD mutants and γ-secretase inhibition accumulate VEGFR2-derived peptide VCTF1 suppressing brain VEGFR2 dimerization, angiogenesis and neuroprotection

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.12.724648

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) , Wild-type (WT) and KI mice HTRZ for either PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were infused with vehicle (0.2% BSA in PBS) or VEGF-A (a total of 3.5μg in 100μl of vehicle) through the carotid artery for 15 days using a mini osmotic pump as in Methods. Left: Brain coronal sections (40μm thick) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies to visualize brain vessels. Enhanced visualization surfaces were generated using Imaris software from representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density in WT and PS1 FAD brains quantified using Imaris 9.9 software as in Methods. (B) , WT and HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutants M146V or I213T mice were injected through the carotid artery for 20 minutes with either vehicle or 100ng of VEGF-A in vehicle prepared as in 1A using a catheter as described in Methods. Brain microvessels (MV) were isolated as in Methods, lysed in Triton X-100 buffer, and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-VEGFR2 antibody or control IgG. Left: IPs were analyzed on Western blots (WBs) using anti-endoglin or anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (upper panel). Input samples are shown in lower panel. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graph shows quantification of endoglin co-IPed with VEGFR2, normalized to IPed VEGFR2. (C) , WT mice were infused for 15 days through the carotid artery with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1A using a mini osmotic pump (as in 1A). For RO injection, mice were treated with vehicle (2% DMSO, 30% PEG 300, 5% Tween-80 in ddH2O) or RO in vehicle (5mg/kg body weight) via five injections in tail vein one injection every three days, with first injection administered 1 hour before osmotic pump implantation. Brain coronal sections (40μm) were prepared and immunostained with anti-Col IV antibodies as in 1A. Left: Representative confocal images of ipsilateral hemispheres are shown prepared as in 1A. Scale bar: 50μm. Right: Graph shows total vessel length density quantified using Imaris software as in 1A. (D) , WT adult mice were treated with either 50μl vehicle as in 1C or 1mg/kg RO in vehicle via carotid artery as in Methods. 15-16 hrs later, 50 μl vehicle prepared as in 1A or 100ng VEGF-A in vehicle was administered via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1B. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. Vinculin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (E) , WT mice and mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T) were treated with vehicle or VEGF-A via carotid artery for 10-20 minutes using a catheter as in 1D. Brain MVs were isolated and extracted as in 1B. Left: p-VEGFR2 (Tyr1054/Tyr1059), VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 are detected on WBs of extracts with specific antibodies in MV extracts. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graphs show fold change of phosphorylated to total protein ratio. (F) , WT pCECs were prepared and treated as in Methods with vehicle (DMSO) or RO (200nM in DMSO) and then stimulated with either vehicle (PBS) or VEGF-A (20ng in PBS) for 15min. Upper: Cells were co-immunostained with either anti-VEGFR2 antibodies (green) or early endosome marker Rab5 (red) and cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in Methods. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in RO-treated WT cells compared to vehicle-treated cells measured with Imaris software. (G) , pCECs from either WT or mice HTRZ for PS1 FAD mutant M146V (WT/M146V) or I213T (WT/I213T), were stimulated with vehicle or VEGF-A in vehicle as in 1F. Upper: Cells were co-stained with anti-VEGFR2 antibodies and early endosome marker Rab5 as in 1F. Cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue) as in 1F. Yellow fluorescence in merged images indicates co-localization of VEGFR2 with Rab5. Scale bar 0.5μm. Lower: Graph shows percent of VEGFR2 co-localized with Rab5 in PS1 FAD WT/M146V or WT/I213T HTRZ mice compared to WT measured with Imaris software. For Figs A-G, data are shown as Mean ± S.E. from at least three independent experiments or as indicated in the dot plots. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test. ns = not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal anti-Flag tag (M2; F1804) was from Millipore Sigma, anti-GAPDH (2118S) from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA), anti-VEGFR2 (OTI12C1) from Origene, anti-endoglin (CD-105; NBP2-22122) and anti-LAMP2 (NBP2-22217) from Novus Biologicals, Inc, anti-Rab5 (D-11) and anti-Rab7 (B-3) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Chicken polyclonal anti-GFAP (ab4674) was from Abcam.

    Techniques: Mutagenesis, Generated, Software, Injection, Isolation, Immunoprecipitation, Control, Western Blot, Marker, Staining, Fluorescence

    (A), Brain tissue extracts were prepared as in Methods from twelve PS1 FAD patients each carrying a different PS1 mutation, and twelve non-demented controls described in Methods. Left: VEGFR2 dimers and monomers were detected in brain extracts on WBs using anti-VEGFR2 antibody D5B1. Representative gels with control (C1-4) or FAD samples (FAD1-4) expressing mutants P264L, A260V, N135S and P242H respectively are shown. Vinculin: loading control. Right: Graph shows the fold change in VEGFR2 dimer to monomer ratio of FAD and control samples. (B), Brain tissue extract from control and PS1 FAD patient brains described in 7A were prepared and IPed with anti-endoglin antibody (ab252345) or IgG as in Methods. Upper panel: VEGFR2 co-IPed with endoglin was detected on WBs using an anti-VEGFR2 antibody as in 7A. Lower panel: Input samples are shown. Representative gel with control samples (C1, C2) and FAD samples (FAD1, FAD2) expressing mutants A260V and P264L respectively is shown. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graph shows relative levels of VEGFR2 co-precipitated with endoglin. (C), Brain sections from control and PS1 FAD patients were prepared as in Methods and stained for Col IV as in 1A. Upper: Representative images show brain vessels in either PS1 FAD or control (CT) brain sections. Scale bar: 80μm. Lower: Graph shows total vessel length density in PS1 FAD and CT brains quantified with Imaris software as in 1A. A-C , bars represent Mean ± S.E. For statistical analysis, unpaired t-test was performed. *p < 0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: PS FAD mutants and γ-secretase inhibition accumulate VEGFR2-derived peptide VCTF1 suppressing brain VEGFR2 dimerization, angiogenesis and neuroprotection

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.12.724648

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A), Brain tissue extracts were prepared as in Methods from twelve PS1 FAD patients each carrying a different PS1 mutation, and twelve non-demented controls described in Methods. Left: VEGFR2 dimers and monomers were detected in brain extracts on WBs using anti-VEGFR2 antibody D5B1. Representative gels with control (C1-4) or FAD samples (FAD1-4) expressing mutants P264L, A260V, N135S and P242H respectively are shown. Vinculin: loading control. Right: Graph shows the fold change in VEGFR2 dimer to monomer ratio of FAD and control samples. (B), Brain tissue extract from control and PS1 FAD patient brains described in 7A were prepared and IPed with anti-endoglin antibody (ab252345) or IgG as in Methods. Upper panel: VEGFR2 co-IPed with endoglin was detected on WBs using an anti-VEGFR2 antibody as in 7A. Lower panel: Input samples are shown. Representative gel with control samples (C1, C2) and FAD samples (FAD1, FAD2) expressing mutants A260V and P264L respectively is shown. β-actin: loading control. Right: Graph shows relative levels of VEGFR2 co-precipitated with endoglin. (C), Brain sections from control and PS1 FAD patients were prepared as in Methods and stained for Col IV as in 1A. Upper: Representative images show brain vessels in either PS1 FAD or control (CT) brain sections. Scale bar: 80μm. Lower: Graph shows total vessel length density in PS1 FAD and CT brains quantified with Imaris software as in 1A. A-C , bars represent Mean ± S.E. For statistical analysis, unpaired t-test was performed. *p < 0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal anti-Flag tag (M2; F1804) was from Millipore Sigma, anti-GAPDH (2118S) from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA), anti-VEGFR2 (OTI12C1) from Origene, anti-endoglin (CD-105; NBP2-22122) and anti-LAMP2 (NBP2-22217) from Novus Biologicals, Inc, anti-Rab5 (D-11) and anti-Rab7 (B-3) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Chicken polyclonal anti-GFAP (ab4674) was from Abcam.

    Techniques: Mutagenesis, Control, Expressing, Staining, Software

    List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Inhibition of TGF-β signaling enhances osteogenic potential of iPSC-derived MSCs

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89370-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: List of antibodies (volume per sample, isotype and conjugate) used for flow cytometry.

    Article Snippet: Therefore, cells were fixed with formalin, blocked for 30 min with 2% BSA and incubated over night with a monoclonal mouse anti-CD105 primary antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml.

    Techniques: Cytometry, Recombinant

    ( A ) Cell morphology during differentiation of iPSCs to iMSCs with SB431542 (+ SB). Representative fluorescence images (10x magnification, scale bar = 100 μm) of undifferentiated iPSCs at day d0 and differentiating cells at different days (d2, d5, d7, and d10) of mesenchymal differentiation (P0). To visualize differentiation, cells were stained for CD105 (green) using a primary mouse anti-CD105 antibody and an AlexaFluor488 labeled secondary goat anti-mouse IgG antibody. The control sample was stained with secondary antibody only. Samples were counterstained with phalloidin-Atto550 (red) and DAPI (blue) to visualize F-actin and nuclei. ( B ) Percentage of CD105 + cells at P0 of iMSC differentiation with (+ SB) and without SB431542 (-SB). To determine the percentage of differentiated cells and the resulting cell density after passaging to P1, CD105 expression in iMSCs of passage 0 was determined by flow cytometry. The two groups were compared using a paired Student’s t-test ( n = 10). ( C ) Representative histogram of CD105 expression in iMSCs + SB (blue), -SB (red) and unstained control (green).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Inhibition of TGF-β signaling enhances osteogenic potential of iPSC-derived MSCs

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89370-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Cell morphology during differentiation of iPSCs to iMSCs with SB431542 (+ SB). Representative fluorescence images (10x magnification, scale bar = 100 μm) of undifferentiated iPSCs at day d0 and differentiating cells at different days (d2, d5, d7, and d10) of mesenchymal differentiation (P0). To visualize differentiation, cells were stained for CD105 (green) using a primary mouse anti-CD105 antibody and an AlexaFluor488 labeled secondary goat anti-mouse IgG antibody. The control sample was stained with secondary antibody only. Samples were counterstained with phalloidin-Atto550 (red) and DAPI (blue) to visualize F-actin and nuclei. ( B ) Percentage of CD105 + cells at P0 of iMSC differentiation with (+ SB) and without SB431542 (-SB). To determine the percentage of differentiated cells and the resulting cell density after passaging to P1, CD105 expression in iMSCs of passage 0 was determined by flow cytometry. The two groups were compared using a paired Student’s t-test ( n = 10). ( C ) Representative histogram of CD105 expression in iMSCs + SB (blue), -SB (red) and unstained control (green).

    Article Snippet: Therefore, cells were fixed with formalin, blocked for 30 min with 2% BSA and incubated over night with a monoclonal mouse anti-CD105 primary antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml.

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Staining, Labeling, Control, Passaging, Expressing, Flow Cytometry

    Surface marker expression during iMSC-differentiation. Expression of ( A ) iPSC-markers (CD326, SSEA-4, SSEA-4, Tra-1-60, Tra-1-81) and ( B ) of MSC-markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105) was measured by flow cytometry. Percentages of positive cells from iPSCs (red) and iMSCs differentiated with (green) and without SB (blue) at different passages of the iMSC differentiation process. Means and standard deviations are displayed and were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tuckey’s multiple comparison test ( n ≥ 7, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; # indicate significant p-values compared to iPSCs).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Inhibition of TGF-β signaling enhances osteogenic potential of iPSC-derived MSCs

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89370-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Surface marker expression during iMSC-differentiation. Expression of ( A ) iPSC-markers (CD326, SSEA-4, SSEA-4, Tra-1-60, Tra-1-81) and ( B ) of MSC-markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105) was measured by flow cytometry. Percentages of positive cells from iPSCs (red) and iMSCs differentiated with (green) and without SB (blue) at different passages of the iMSC differentiation process. Means and standard deviations are displayed and were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tuckey’s multiple comparison test ( n ≥ 7, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; # indicate significant p-values compared to iPSCs).

    Article Snippet: Therefore, cells were fixed with formalin, blocked for 30 min with 2% BSA and incubated over night with a monoclonal mouse anti-CD105 primary antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml.

    Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Comparison

    EXO KV11 suppresses VEGF-induced vascular leakage in vivo . (A) Schematic depiction of the pre-treatment procedure in a VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. After 24 h, 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 24 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested at the endpoint. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 7 - 10 mice per condition). (D) Representative confocal images of anti-CD105, anti-Claudin-5-stained retinal vessels in mice treated as in (A). (E) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (F) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (E) (n = 4 - 9 mice per condition). (G) Representative photographs of Evans blue leakage in SD rats ears in an auricular Miles assay with intradermal injection with VEGF, VEGF+KV11 mixture, or VEGF+EXO KV11 mixture. The data represent as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (F). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Exosome-mediated delivery of an anti-angiogenic peptide inhibits pathological retinal angiogenesis

    doi: 10.7150/thno.54755

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EXO KV11 suppresses VEGF-induced vascular leakage in vivo . (A) Schematic depiction of the pre-treatment procedure in a VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. After 24 h, 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 24 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested at the endpoint. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 7 - 10 mice per condition). (D) Representative confocal images of anti-CD105, anti-Claudin-5-stained retinal vessels in mice treated as in (A). (E) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (F) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (E) (n = 4 - 9 mice per condition). (G) Representative photographs of Evans blue leakage in SD rats ears in an auricular Miles assay with intradermal injection with VEGF, VEGF+KV11 mixture, or VEGF+EXO KV11 mixture. The data represent as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (F). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Article Snippet: For IF staining of red blood cells, blood vessels, macrophage and microglia, flat-mounted retinas were incubated in blocking solution with following primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight: rat anti-TER119 monoclonal (1:200, MAB1125, RD, US); rat anti-CD105 monoclonal (1:200, MAB1320, RD, US); rabbit anti-F4/80 monoclonal (1:200, 30325S, Cell Signaling Technology, US); mouse anti-Claudin-5 monoclonal (1:200, 35-2500, Invitrogen, US) and rabbit anti-ZO-1 polyclonal (1:300, 61-7300, Invitrogen, US).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Staining

    EXO KV11 has therapeutic effect in post-treatment model. (A) Schematic depiction of the post-treatment procedure in VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. After 24 h, EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 48 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested after treatment. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). (D) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (E) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (D) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). The data represent as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (E). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Exosome-mediated delivery of an anti-angiogenic peptide inhibits pathological retinal angiogenesis

    doi: 10.7150/thno.54755

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EXO KV11 has therapeutic effect in post-treatment model. (A) Schematic depiction of the post-treatment procedure in VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. After 24 h, EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 48 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested after treatment. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). (D) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (E) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (D) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). The data represent as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (E). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Article Snippet: For IF staining of red blood cells, blood vessels, macrophage and microglia, flat-mounted retinas were incubated in blocking solution with following primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight: rat anti-TER119 monoclonal (1:200, MAB1125, RD, US); rat anti-CD105 monoclonal (1:200, MAB1320, RD, US); rabbit anti-F4/80 monoclonal (1:200, 30325S, Cell Signaling Technology, US); mouse anti-Claudin-5 monoclonal (1:200, 35-2500, Invitrogen, US) and rabbit anti-ZO-1 polyclonal (1:300, 61-7300, Invitrogen, US).

    Techniques: Injection

    EXO KV11 suppresses VEGF-induced vascular leakage in vivo . (A) Schematic depiction of the pre-treatment procedure in a VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. After 24 h, 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 24 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested at the endpoint. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 7 - 10 mice per condition). (D) Representative confocal images of anti-CD105, anti-Claudin-5-stained retinal vessels in mice treated as in (A). (E) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (F) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (E) (n = 4 - 9 mice per condition). (G) Representative photographs of Evans blue leakage in SD rats ears in an auricular Miles assay with intradermal injection with VEGF, VEGF+KV11 mixture, or VEGF+EXO KV11 mixture. The data represent as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (F). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Exosome-mediated delivery of an anti-angiogenic peptide inhibits pathological retinal angiogenesis

    doi: 10.7150/thno.54755

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EXO KV11 suppresses VEGF-induced vascular leakage in vivo . (A) Schematic depiction of the pre-treatment procedure in a VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. After 24 h, 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 24 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested at the endpoint. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 7 - 10 mice per condition). (D) Representative confocal images of anti-CD105, anti-Claudin-5-stained retinal vessels in mice treated as in (A). (E) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (F) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (E) (n = 4 - 9 mice per condition). (G) Representative photographs of Evans blue leakage in SD rats ears in an auricular Miles assay with intradermal injection with VEGF, VEGF+KV11 mixture, or VEGF+EXO KV11 mixture. The data represent as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (F). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Article Snippet: In VEGF induced retina vascular leakage model, retinas were incubated in blocking solution with the primary antibody rat anti-CD105 monoclonal (1:200, MAB1320, RD, US) at 4 °C overnight after permeabilization and blocking.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Staining

    EXO KV11 has therapeutic effect in post-treatment model. (A) Schematic depiction of the post-treatment procedure in VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. After 24 h, EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 48 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested after treatment. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). (D) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (E) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (D) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). The data represent as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (E). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Journal: Theranostics

    Article Title: Exosome-mediated delivery of an anti-angiogenic peptide inhibits pathological retinal angiogenesis

    doi: 10.7150/thno.54755

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EXO KV11 has therapeutic effect in post-treatment model. (A) Schematic depiction of the post-treatment procedure in VEGF-induced vascular leakage model. 100 ng VEGF was intravitreally injected to induce vascular leakage in the retina. After 24 h, EXO KV11 , KV11, EXO, or vehicle was retro-orbitally injected in adult wild type C57BL/6J mice. The mice were sacrificed for analysis after another 48 h. (B) FITC-dextran was injected and the retinas were harvested after treatment. Representative images of flat-mounted retina show extravasated FITC-dextran and CD105 + vessels. (C) Quantification of dextran leakage in (B) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). (D) Representative images of F4/80 + macrophages (green) and CD105 + vessels in retinas treated as in (A). (E) Quantification of macrophage infiltration in (D) (n = 4 - 6 mice per condition). The data represent as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test in (C), (E). Scale bars, 50 µm.

    Article Snippet: In VEGF induced retina vascular leakage model, retinas were incubated in blocking solution with the primary antibody rat anti-CD105 monoclonal (1:200, MAB1320, RD, US) at 4 °C overnight after permeabilization and blocking.

    Techniques: Injection